Lawfare Definitions, Manipulation of Medical Terminology  & Pending Change in the Definition of Human. President Eisenhower's Warning comes to pass.

The end goal of Covid lawfare (aka the 4th Industrial Revolution) per the World Economic Forum (WEF), is the fusion of the biological, digital and physical. The WEF, which is the world's  preeminent privateer policy group (commissioned by the Military Industrial Complex) has proclaimed this coming fusion will result in the redefinition of the term "human" as something other than natural.

This re-definition, if it occurs, will 
provide the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) & its privateers with the requisite legal framework (lawfare) to claim that their nano-technology (when inserted into re-defined  humans) should be considered proprietary. Consider the model of Monsanto. Whenever and wherever the wind intermingled their GMO seeds with the crop of an adjacent farmer, they claimed that farmer's output as their own.

Similarly, if covid "vaccines" via CRISPR genetic editing result in human mutagenesis, it could enable the MIC & its privateers to patent the resultant products, caused by or fused with their proprietary inter-corporeal nano materials (INMs).  Therefore, to facilitate the expropriation and control of human biology, the deployment of INMs is being advanced by putative private entities, utilizing the same subterfuge the MIC employed with its roll out of Facebook and Google. Just as these data corporations were legally constructed as 1st Amendment work arounds, syn-bio privateers are being positioned as immune from constitutional and human rights oversight and therefore free to own INMs and their output.

President & Allied Supreme Commander Eisenhower forewarned us that without active vigilance the MIC would seek and achieve full spectrum dominance. Synthetic biology has now armed the MIC with the ultimate weapon to make that warning a reality.

We are in a desperate race against time as the MIC globally deploys its INMs, readying itself to remotely monitor and control every re-defined human on the planet. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpW9JcWxKq0
https://www.from-the-interface.com/DARPA-funding-BCI-research/

Lawfare is defined as the abuse of law or judicial systems to achieve military or political ends. Lawfare consists of the negative manipulation of laws or public policy to accomplish purposes contrary to, those for which they were originally enacted (see Wikipedia/Lawfare) Project).

Covid lawfare is the use of a pandemic to manipulate public health policy, expert medical opinion, regulatory guidelines and judicial decisions, to accomplish subterfuge contrary to the public good. Vaccine lawfare (as a subset of Covid lawfare), is the primary mechanism which justifies and  enables the ever increasing control and subjugation of population.  

In order to achieve this subterfuge, by means of covid lawfare, the definition of "vaccine" and "vaccination" needed to be changed, since covid "vaccines" do not produce immunity to disease. 
Vaccination (pre 2020 definition): [Note definition still used in Canada] 
“the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”
https://immunizebc.ca/what-are-vaccines 

Vaccines (pre 2020 def.): "a product that stimulates a person's immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease." 

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article254111268.html

Immunity (current CDC definition) : "Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected."
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm

After 2020 definitionally vaccines were no longer required to confer “immunity” but only protection. 
Vaccination (def. post 2020): "The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease."

Vaccines (def. post 2020) "preparation used to stimulate the body's immune response against diseases. 

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm


*See Warning & Disclaimers on the Home pageInformation on this website is strictly the opinion of presenters. This information is general in nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice, because legal advice cannot be given without full consideration of all relevant information relating to the reader’s individual situation.